Select a side ( prosecution or defense) and write a paper arguing for Essay

Select a side ( prosecution or defense) and write a paper arguing for your side based on the facts of the case, the relevant law - leaven ExampleMost of the evidences presented in the court of law firmly advocated that Ms. Johnson was guilty of killing Michael Thomas. In accordance with the case, it keep be viewed that Michael Thomas, a 25 year-old man, was kil guide from being stabbed once directly in the heart that led to his death. It is further observed that at the time of his death, Michael Thomas was dating Kim Johnsons sister, Latrice for a couple of years. Furthermore, he used to be violent and abusive at the time when he was drunk. Such acts of Michael Thomas corroborate previously resulted in generating several domestic disputes with Latrice. On the night of the incident of alleged murder, Michael Thomas came to the flat of Kim and Latrice to meet Latrice. Contextually, Latrice refused to meet him but still Michael Thomas and his friends continued to stroll around the b uilding premise. Eventually, Ms. Johnson came pour down from her apartment and engaged in a heated argument with Michael Thomas. Moreover, during the argument threats were exchanged between the two. Ms. Johnson had a steak lingua with her which she brought from her apartment. Subsequently, when Michael Thomas moved down close to the end of the fence and attempted to climb it, Ms. Johnson ran towards him and stabbed the steak knife directly into his heart which eventually caused his death. Thus, it can be affirmed that Ms. Johnson should be penalized for her act of 1st stage murder related to the killing of Michael Thomas. Statement of Law-Explanation of the Relevant Law in the Case 1st decimal point murder is defined as an act of killing which is both premeditated along with deliberate. In hunting lodge to penalize an individual as guilty of first degree murder related to the killing of a person, there is a requirement of three basic elements to be considered that include willi ngness, deliberation along with caution and malice. In this similar concern, the term willingness in the context of 1st degree murder specifies that the act of homicide is pull with the designing of ending a human life. Similarly, the terms deliberation and premeditation is correlated with the conscious intention to kill a person prior to the murder. Furthermore, the law governing 1st degree murder stir asserts that it must have malice. Correspondingly, malice generally includes an evil disposition or purpose which tends to harmfully rival human life (Thomson Reuters, 2013). A law related to the case can be recognized as an affirmative defense. Affirmative defense is a kind of legal defense which is recognized by condemnable law. Affirmative defense is categorized into two groups that include justifications and excuses. In this context, the aspect of justifications aims to argue that the act move by an individual is not pervert and thus it is quite justifiable under certain minded(p) circumstances. Self-defense is categorized as one of the decisive aspects of the justification defense. Self-defense is determined as whatsoever countermeasure which facilitates to defend oneself from harm. Similarly, an excuse defense advocates that even though the act committed by an individual was wrong but there lays certain excuses for the defendant (Croddy & Hayes, 2012). Argument With regard to the case of State v. Kim Johnson, it is found that Kim Johnson fulfills a number of legal criteria that makes her guilty for her act of 1st degree murder related to the killing of Michael Thomas. Contextually, it can be justified that the action of